Why Most Leadership Communication Training is Missing the Point (And What Actually Works)

Related Reading:

• Growth Matrix Blog
• Proclamation Store Insights

Nobody talks about the elephant in the room when it comes to leadership communication training. We spend thousands on courses that teach people to speak with "executive presence" and "gravitas," but half these newly-minted leaders still can't explain why the quarterly reports are two weeks late without causing a minor workplace revolt.

I've been running leadership programmes across Melbourne and Sydney for the past 18 years, and I'll tell you something that might ruffle a few feathers: most leadership communication training is teaching people to sound important rather than actually communicate effectively. And frankly, it's doing more harm than good.

The Real Problem Isn't What You Think

Here's where everyone gets it wrong. They think leadership communication is about polished presentations and boardroom gravitas. Wrong.

The biggest communication failures I see happen in hallway conversations, team check-ins, and those awkward moments when someone's performance has dropped off a cliff. You know, the stuff that actually matters day-to-day.

Last month I worked with a finance director in Brisbane who could deliver a flawless quarterly review to 200 people but couldn't tell her direct report that his constant interrupting was driving the team mental. That's not a presentation skills problem – that's a fundamental customer service issue when it comes to internal relationships.

Most training programmes focus on the wrong metrics. They measure confidence, clarity, and charisma. But they don't measure whether people actually understand what the hell you're trying to tell them.

What Actually Works (Based on Real Results, Not Theory)

After watching hundreds of leaders struggle and succeed, here's what I've noticed actually moves the needle:

The 15-Second Rule

If you can't explain your main point in 15 seconds, you don't understand it well enough to lead anyone. Period.

I started implementing this rule after watching a senior manager spend 20 minutes explaining why the office kitchen guidelines needed updating. Twenty minutes! For kitchen guidelines! Meanwhile, his team was sitting there thinking about actual work they needed to finish.

The 15-second rule forces clarity. Not because I'm obsessed with brevity, but because unclear leaders create unclear teams. And unclear teams deliver unclear results.

Stop Teaching "Executive Voice"

This drives me absolutely mental. Half the leadership communication courses I've seen spend time teaching people to lower their voice and slow their speech to sound more "authoritative."

What a load of rubbish.

I've worked with brilliant leaders who speak quickly, quietly, and with regional accents. They're effective because they're authentic and they actually listen to responses. Authenticity trumps artificial gravitas every single time.

The best leader I ever worked with – a manufacturing CEO in Adelaide – spoke like he'd just stepped off a building site. His team would run through walls for him because he communicated with genuine respect and clarity. Not because he sounded like a BBC newsreader.

The Follow-Up Reality Check

Here's something nobody talks about: most leaders think they're better communicators than they actually are. It's like asking someone if they're a good driver – 73% will say yes, but have you seen how people actually drive?

I implemented a simple feedback system where team members anonymously rate whether they understood and agreed with recent leadership communications. The results are eye-opening. Leaders who thought they were crushing it often discover their "clear direction" was interpreted three different ways by three different people.

One IT director I worked with was convinced his weekly team emails were models of clarity. Turns out, his team had started a group chat specifically to decode what he actually meant. That's when you know your communication strategy needs work.

The Three Things That Actually Matter

1. Context Before Content

Most leaders jump straight to the "what" without explaining the "why." This is backwards.

Your team doesn't need another update on project timelines. They need to understand why those timelines matter, what happens if things slip, and how their specific work connects to the bigger picture.

I learned this lesson the hard way early in my career when I was managing a customer service team in Perth. I kept giving them scripts and processes without explaining why angry customers were calling in the first place. Performance stayed mediocre until I started sharing the business context. Once they understood the bigger picture, they started solving problems instead of just following procedures.

2. Questions Beat Statements

The best leaders I've worked with ask more questions than they make statements. Not because they don't know what they're doing, but because they understand that managing difficult conversations requires understanding the other person's perspective first.

Questions also reveal whether your previous communications actually landed. "What questions do you have?" is not the same as "Does everyone understand?" The first one actually gets useful responses.

3. Timing Matters More Than Perfect Words

This one's controversial: sometimes good enough communication delivered at the right time beats perfect communication delivered too late.

I worked with a retail chain CEO who was obsessed with crafting the perfect response to every situation. By the time he'd wordsmithed his way to perfection, rumours had filled the vacuum and his team was operating on incomplete or incorrect information.

Better to give people 80% of the information they need today than 100% of the information they need next week. You can always clarify and add detail later.

The Uncomfortable Truth About Leadership Communication

Most leadership communication problems aren't communication problems – they're leadership problems.

If you're struggling to communicate effectively as a leader, maybe the issue isn't your delivery. Maybe it's that you're trying to communicate things you don't actually believe, understand, or have clear authority to implement.

I've seen too many leaders tie themselves in knots trying to communicate decisions they disagree with or strategies they don't understand. No amount of communication training fixes that fundamental misalignment.

The best communicators I've worked with are also the most authentic leaders. They say what they mean, they mean what they say, and they're comfortable with the fact that not everyone will agree with them.

What to Do Instead

If you're serious about improving leadership communication, here's what actually works:

Start with one-on-one conversations before group communications. Test your message with a trusted team member. Ask them to explain back what they heard. You'll be surprised how often the message that made perfect sense in your head gets completely lost in translation.

Focus on time management – not just for efficiency, but because rushed communications are usually unclear communications. If you're always pressed for time, you'll default to quick, unclear instructions that create more work for everyone.

Practice saying "I don't know, but I'll find out" instead of waffling through uncertain responses. Your team would rather hear honest uncertainty than confident nonsense.

The Bottom Line

Leadership communication isn't about sounding like a leader. It's about being understood, creating clarity, and enabling your team to do their best work.

Most training programmes teach performance instead of effectiveness. They create leaders who sound impressive but communicate poorly.

The real skill is being able to explain complex situations simply, listen more than you talk, and create clarity even when you don't have all the answers.

Everything else is just theatre.

And if you're wondering whether your communication is actually working, don't ask yourself – ask your team. Preferably anonymously. The answers might surprise you.